# A Lexical T&#8209;Maze for Active Inference&#58; A Proof&#8209;of&#8209;Concept Model of Context Seeking Under Ambiguity

Presenter: Ahmad Nazzal

Contribution: Pre&#45;recorded Video presentation

Public ID: talk&#45;d68bd36185ba7570

## Submitted abstract

Lexical&#8209;disambiguation tasks with supplied context do not reveal whether readers would choose to seek evidence before deciding&#46; Therefore&#44; we adapted the spatial T&#8209;maze in the active&#8209;inference package pymdp to show how agents seek and use contextual information under lexical uncertainty&#46; Agents could choose between two readings or request a contextual hint&#46; We performed two main sets of simulations&#46; First&#44; deterministic simulations used fully informative hints to reproduce context seeking followed by lexical commitment&#46; A hint shifted belief over two readings from equal probabilities &#40;0&#46;50&#44; 0&#46;50&#41; to certainty &#40;1&#46;00&#44; 0&#46;00&#41;&#44; reducing entropy by one bit&#46; Second&#44; lexical decision trials were repeatedwith informativeanduninformative hints across 32 paired simulationruns&#46; Agents learned the relationship between the intended reading and the observed hint&#46; Informative experience increased both the probability and simulated frequency of requesting context&#46; This increase persisted when trials ended after one response and feedback&#46; A hint information&#8209;gain ablation&#44; in which policies were rescored without crediting the information expected from hints&#44; eliminated the learning&#8209;related increase in hint&#8209;request probability&#46; These simulations demonstrate how experience changes the expected informational value of context within a lexical task&#44; providing a computational proof of concept for subsequent behavioral experiments&#46;

Source: [submitted source](<https://2026symposium.activeinference.institute/>)

Abstract SHA256: cba3606cc6e2fe01a7544b42973a27aa0950f042661362b119bfee12223bc968

## Organizer review checklist

- [ ] Confirm the submitted title, presenter, and abstract with the presenter.
- [ ] Confirm contribution format and scheduling needs.
- [ ] Confirm public permissions for any additional material before publication.
- [ ] Prepare discussion questions grounded in the submitted abstract.

## Public learning resources

These approved event resources are starting points; topic relevance and author identity have not been inferred.

- Active Inference Ontology: https&#58;&#47;&#47;github&#46;com&#47;ActiveInferenceInstitute&#47;Active&#95;Inference&#95;Ontology
- Cognitive Agent Modeling: https&#58;&#47;&#47;github&#46;com&#47;ActiveInferenceInstitute&#47;ActiveInferenceImplementations
- GEO&#45;INFER: https&#58;&#47;&#47;github&#46;com&#47;ActiveInferenceInstitute&#47;GEO&#95;INFER
- Generalized Notation Notation: https&#58;&#47;&#47;github&#46;com&#47;ActiveInferenceInstitute&#47;Generalized&#95;Notation&#95;Notation
- pymdp: https&#58;&#47;&#47;github&#46;com&#47;infer&#45;actively&#47;pymdp
- Reproducible publication template: https&#58;&#47;&#47;github&#46;com&#47;docxology&#47;template

OpenAlex discovery-only search (not a verified identity or literature match): https&#58;&#47;&#47;openalex&#46;org&#47;works&#63;search&#61;A&#37;20Lexical&#37;20T&#37;E2&#37;80&#37;91Maze&#37;20for&#37;20Active&#37;20Inference&#37;3A&#37;20A&#37;20Proof&#37;E2&#37;80&#37;91of&#37;E2&#37;80&#37;91Concept&#37;20Model&#37;20of&#37;20Context&#37;20Seeking&#37;20Under&#37;20Ambiguity
